Toyota Starlet 1996 vs Suzuki Swift 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 94 HP | |
| Torque: | 115 NM | 118 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 13.5 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Swift is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Starlet engine produces 19 HP less power than Suzuki Swift, whereas torque is 3 NM less than Suzuki Swift. Due to the lower power, Toyota Starlet reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 5.6 | |
|
The Suzuki Swift is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Starlet consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Starlet could require 330 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| Suzuki Swift gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.74 m | 3.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Toyota Starlet is smaller. Toyota Starlet is 11 cm shorter than the Suzuki Swift, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Starlet is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 204 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 900 | 1`480 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Starlet has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |