Toyota Starlet 1996 vs Toyota Corolla 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 96 HP | |
| Torque: | 115 NM | 130 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Toyota Corolla is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Starlet engine produces 21 HP less power than Toyota Corolla, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Toyota Corolla. Due to the lower power, Toyota Starlet reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 6.8 | |
|
The Toyota Corolla is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Starlet consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Starlet could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Corolla gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.74 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Toyota Starlet is smaller, but slightly higher. Toyota Starlet is 55 cm shorter than the Toyota Corolla, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Starlet is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 900 | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Toyota Corolla has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota Starlet has serious deffects in 90 percent more cases than Toyota Corolla, so Toyota Corolla quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |