Toyota Starlet 1996 vs Suzuki Alto 1996
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 54 HP | |
| Torque: | 115 NM | 77 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Toyota Starlet engine produces 21 HP more power than Suzuki Alto, whereas torque is 38 NM more than Suzuki Alto. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 7.2 | |
|
The Suzuki Alto is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Starlet consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Alto, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Starlet could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 480 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km on highway | 570 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Starlet gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.74 m | 3.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.50 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Toyota Starlet is larger. Toyota Starlet is 24 cm longer than the Suzuki Alto, 14 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 8.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Starlet is 1 metres more than that of the Suzuki Alto, which means Toyota Starlet can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 900 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Starlet has
|
Suzuki Alto has
| |