Toyota Starlet 1996 vs Nissan Micra 2000
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 HP | 82 HP | |
Torque: | 115 NM | 108 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
Nissan Micra is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Starlet engine produces 7 HP less power than Nissan Micra, but torque is 7 NM more than Nissan Micra. Due to the lower power, Toyota Starlet reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 6.4 | |
The Nissan Micra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Starlet consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Starlet could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 42 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
690 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
Nissan Micra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.74 m | 3.75 m | |
Width: | 1.64 m | 1.60 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.44 m | |
Toyota Starlet is 1 cm shorter than the Nissan Micra, 4 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Starlet is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 205 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 960 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 9.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Toyota Starlet is 0.4 metres more than that of the Nissan Micra, which means Toyota Starlet can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 900 | 1`360 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | Nissan Micra has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota Starlet has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Nissan Micra, so Nissan Micra quality is probably significantly better | ||
Average price (€): | 3600 | 1600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Nissan Micra has
| |