Toyota Starlet 1996 vs Honda Civic 1995
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 HP | 90 HP | |
Torque: | 115 NM | 124 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 13.4 seconds | |
Honda Civic is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Starlet engine produces 15 HP less power than Honda Civic, whereas torque is 9 NM less than Honda Civic. Due to the lower power, Toyota Starlet reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 7.6 | |
Toyota Starlet consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Starlet could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
690 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.74 m | 4.19 m | |
Width: | 1.64 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.38 m | |
Toyota Starlet is smaller, but slightly higher. Toyota Starlet is 45 cm shorter than the Honda Civic, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Starlet is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 10 meters | |
The turning circle of the Toyota Starlet is 0.4 metres less than that of the Honda Civic, which means Toyota Starlet can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 900 | 1`540 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | high | above average | |
Toyota Starlet has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda Civic has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Toyota Starlet, so Toyota Starlet quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 3600 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Starlet has
|
Honda Civic has
| |