Toyota Starlet 1996 vs Suzuki Alto 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 54 HP | |
| Torque: | 115 NM | 73 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 15.5 seconds | |
|
Toyota Starlet is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Starlet engine produces 21 HP more power than Suzuki Alto, whereas torque is 42 NM more than Suzuki Alto. Thanks to more power Toyota Starlet reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 5.4 | |
|
The Suzuki Alto is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Starlet consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Alto, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Starlet could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.74 m | 3.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.50 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Toyota Starlet is larger. Toyota Starlet is 24 cm longer than the Suzuki Alto, 14 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 8.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Starlet is 1 metres more than that of the Suzuki Alto, which means Toyota Starlet can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 900 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Starlet has
|
Suzuki Alto has
| |