Toyota Starlet 1996 vs Honda Civic 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 115 NM | 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
| Toyota Starlet engine produces 15 HP less power than Honda Civic, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Honda Civic. Despite less power, Toyota Starlet reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 7.5 | |
|
The Toyota Starlet is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Starlet consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic, which means that by driving the Toyota Starlet over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| Honda Civic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.74 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Toyota Starlet is smaller, but slightly higher. Toyota Starlet is 58 cm shorter than the Honda Civic, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Starlet is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 375 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Starlet is 0.7 metres less than that of the Honda Civic, which means Toyota Starlet can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 900 | 1`520 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Toyota Starlet has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda Civic has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Toyota Starlet, so Toyota Starlet quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Starlet has
|
Honda Civic has
| |