Toyota Starlet 1990 vs Volkswagen Polo 1994
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Toyota Starlet is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Volkswagen Polo has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.3 (petrol) | 1.0 - 1.9 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 45 - 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 101 NM | 76 - 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 10.5 - 21.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 4.7 - 8.6 | |
|
Toyota Starlet petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Polo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.72 m | 3.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.42 m | |
| Toyota Starlet and Volkswagen Polo are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 245 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 975 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Starlet is 1.8 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Toyota Starlet can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 800 | ~ 1`401 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Starlet has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |