Toyota Starlet 1990 vs Toyota 4-Runner 1989
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
---|---|---|---|
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
Toyota Starlet is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Toyota 4-Runner has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Toyota Starlet is available with front wheel drive, while Toyota 4-Runner can be equipped with four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.3 (petrol) | 2.4 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Both cars are available with petrol engines. Toyota 4-Runner is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 HP | 90 - 143 HP | |
Torque: | 101 NM | 192 - 295 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 15.3 - 22 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 11.5 - 14.7 | |
Toyota Starlet petrol engines consumes on average 8.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota 4-Runner. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.72 m | 4.49 m | |
Width: | 1.60 m | 1.69 m | |
Height: | 1.39 m | 1.75 m | |
Toyota Starlet is smaller. Toyota Starlet is 77 cm shorter than the Toyota 4-Runner, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Starlet is 36 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 1200 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2100 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Toyota Starlet is 2.4 metres less than that of the Toyota 4-Runner, which means Toyota Starlet can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 800 | ~ 2`490 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | high | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Starlet has
|
Toyota 4-Runner has
| |