Toyota Starlet 1990 vs Ford KA 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 | 1.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 50 - 70 HP | |
| Torque: | 101 NM | 97 - 106 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 14.1 - 17.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 5.9 - 6.7 | |
|
Toyota Starlet petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford KA. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.72 m | 3.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.63 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.37 m | |
| Toyota Starlet is 10 cm longer than the Ford KA, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Starlet is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 186 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 724 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Starlet is 0.8 metres less than that of the Ford KA, which means Toyota Starlet can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 800 | ~ 1`265 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Starlet has
|
| |