Toyota Starlet 1990 vs Toyota Corolla 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.5 | 1.3 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 54 - 75 HP | 72 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 91 - 103 NM | 120 - 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 - 14.5 seconds | 10.2 - 16.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 - 7.4 | 6.4 - 8.7 | |
|
Toyota Starlet petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Corolla. On average, Toyota Starlet equipped with diesel engines consume 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.72 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Toyota Starlet is smaller, but slightly higher. Toyota Starlet is 55 cm shorter than the Toyota Corolla, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Starlet is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 372 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Starlet is 0.6 metres less than that of the Toyota Corolla, which means Toyota Starlet can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 800 | ~ 1`608 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Starlet has
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |