Toyota Starlet 1990 vs Toyota Starlet 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.5 (petrol, diesel) | 1.3 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 54 - 75 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 91 - 103 NM | 115 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 - 14.5 seconds | 11.2 - 15 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 - 7.4 | 6.8 - 7.8 | |
|
Toyota Starlet 1990 petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Starlet 1996. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.72 m | 3.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Toyota Starlet 1990 is smaller. Toyota Starlet 1990 is 2 cm shorter than the Toyota Starlet 1996, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Starlet 1990 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Starlet 1990 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Toyota Starlet 1996, which means Toyota Starlet 1990 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 800 | ~ 900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Starlet has
|
Toyota Starlet has
| |