Toyota Starlet 1990 vs Toyota Carina E 1992
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.5 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 54 - 75 HP | 73 - 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 91 - 103 NM | 132 - 186 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 - 14.5 seconds | 8.4 - 16.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 - 7.4 | 5.8 - 8.5 | |
|
Toyota Starlet petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Carina E. On average, Toyota Starlet equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Carina E. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.72 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Toyota Starlet is smaller. Toyota Starlet is 81 cm shorter than the Toyota Carina E, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Starlet is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1250 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Starlet is 1.8 metres less than that of the Toyota Carina E, which means Toyota Starlet can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 800 | ~ 1`684 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Starlet has
|
| |