Toyota Starlet 1990 vs Honda Jazz 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.5 (petrol, diesel) | 1.2 - 1.3 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 54 - 75 HP | 78 - 83 HP | |
| Torque: | 91 - 103 NM | 110 - 119 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 - 14.5 seconds | 11.9 - 13.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 - 7.4 | 5.3 - 5.8 | |
|
Toyota Starlet petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda Jazz. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.72 m | 3.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Toyota Starlet is smaller. Toyota Starlet is 11 cm shorter than the Honda Jazz, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Starlet is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1323 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Starlet is 0.8 metres less than that of the Honda Jazz, which means Toyota Starlet can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 800 | ~ 1`465 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Starlet has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |