Toyota Starlet 1990 vs Honda Civic 1996

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Toyota Starlet
1990 - 1996
Honda Civic
1996 - 2001
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.3 - 1.5 (petrol, diesel)1.4 - 1.6 (petrol)

Performance

Power: 54 - 75 HP90 - 160 HP
Torque: 91 - 103 NM124 - 153 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.3 - 14.5 seconds8.1 - 13.7 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.8 - 7.46.8 - 8.4
Toyota Starlet petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Honda Civic.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 3.72 m4.46 m
Width: 1.60 m1.70 m
Height: 1.39 m1.39 m
Toyota Starlet is smaller.
Toyota Starlet is 74 cm shorter than the Honda Civic, 10 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: no data410 litres
Turning diameter: 9 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Toyota Starlet is 1 metres less than that of the Honda Civic, which means Toyota Starlet can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 800~ 1`594
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

above average
Average price (€): 1200800
Pros and Cons: Toyota Starlet has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Honda Civic has
  • only petrol engines available
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv