Toyota Starlet 1996 vs Toyota Camry 2006

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Toyota Starlet
1996 - 1999
Toyota Camry
2006 - 2009
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.32.4 - 3.5

Performance

Power: 75 HP167 - 272 HP
Torque: 115 NM224 - 336 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.2 - 15 seconds7.6 - 9.6 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.8 - 7.88.5 - 11.0
Toyota Starlet petrol engines consumes on average 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Camry.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 3.74 m4.82 m
Width: 1.64 m1.82 m
Height: 1.40 m1.47 m
Toyota Starlet is smaller.
Toyota Starlet is 108 cm shorter than the Toyota Camry, 18 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Starlet is 7 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data535 litres
Turning diameter: 9.6 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Toyota Starlet is 1.4 metres less than that of the Toyota Camry, which means Toyota Starlet can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 900~ 1`985
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high
no data
Average price (€): no data5800
Pros and Cons: Toyota Starlet has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv