Toyota Starlet 1996 vs Suzuki Swift 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 (petrol) | 1.2 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Suzuki Swift is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 75 - 94 HP | |
| Torque: | 115 NM | 118 - 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 - 15 seconds | 12.3 - 13.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 - 7.8 | 4.2 - 5.6 | |
|
Toyota Starlet petrol engines consumes on average 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Suzuki Swift. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.74 m | 3.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Toyota Starlet is smaller. Toyota Starlet is 11 cm shorter than the Suzuki Swift, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Starlet is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 204 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 900 | ~ 1`507 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Starlet has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |