Toyota Starlet 1996 vs Toyota iQ 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 (petrol) | 1.0 - 1.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 68 - 98 HP | |
| Torque: | 115 NM | 91 - 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 - 15 seconds | 10.7 - 15.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 - 7.8 | 4.0 - 5.1 | |
|
Toyota Starlet petrol engines consumes on average 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota iQ. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.74 m | 2.99 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.50 m | |
| Toyota Starlet is 76 cm longer than the Toyota iQ, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Starlet is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 32 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 363 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 7.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Starlet is 1.8 metres more than that of the Toyota iQ, which means Toyota Starlet can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 900 | ~ 1`259 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Starlet has
|
Toyota iQ has
| |