Toyota Starlet 1996 vs Toyota Starlet 1990
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 (petrol) | 1.3 - 1.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 54 - 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 115 NM | 91 - 103 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 - 15 seconds | 10.3 - 14.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 - 7.8 | 4.8 - 7.4 | |
|
Toyota Starlet 1996 petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Starlet 1990. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.74 m | 3.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Toyota Starlet 1996 is larger. Toyota Starlet 1996 is 2 cm longer than the Toyota Starlet 1990, 4 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Starlet 1996 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Starlet 1996 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Toyota Starlet 1990, which means Toyota Starlet 1996 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 900 | ~ 800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Starlet has
|
Toyota Starlet has
| |