Toyota Starlet 1996 vs Nissan Note 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 (petrol) | 1.4 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 68 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 115 NM | 128 - 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 - 15 seconds | 10.7 - 16.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 - 7.8 | 5.1 - 7.0 | |
|
Toyota Starlet petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Note. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.74 m | 4.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Toyota Starlet is smaller. Toyota Starlet is 34 cm shorter than the Nissan Note, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Starlet is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1332 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Starlet is 1.4 metres less than that of the Nissan Note, which means Toyota Starlet can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 900 | ~ 1`576 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Starlet has
|
Nissan Note has
| |