Toyota Starlet 1996 vs Nissan Micra 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 (petrol) | 1.0 - 1.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Nissan Micra is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 57 - 82 HP | |
| Torque: | 115 NM | 80 - 108 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 - 15 seconds | 11.9 - 18.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 - 7.8 | 5.2 - 6.4 | |
|
Toyota Starlet petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Micra. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.74 m | 3.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.44 m | |
| Toyota Starlet is 1 cm shorter than the Nissan Micra, 4 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Starlet is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 206 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 960 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Starlet is 0.2 metres less than that of the Nissan Micra. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 900 | ~ 1`358 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Starlet has
|
Nissan Micra has
| |