Toyota Starlet 1996 vs Honda Civic 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 (petrol) | 1.4 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 90 - 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 115 NM | 120 - 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 - 15 seconds | 8.3 - 14.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 - 7.8 | 5.3 - 9.1 | |
|
Toyota Starlet petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Honda Civic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.74 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Toyota Starlet is smaller, but slightly higher. Toyota Starlet is 58 cm shorter than the Honda Civic, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Starlet is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 835 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Starlet is 0.7 metres less than that of the Honda Civic, which means Toyota Starlet can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 900 | ~ 1`601 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Starlet has
|
Honda Civic has
| |