Toyota Sienna 2010 vs Volvo XC90 2002
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 2.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 187 HP | 272 HP | |
| Torque: | 252 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
| Toyota Sienna engine produces 85 HP less power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 128 NM less than Volvo XC90. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 12.9 | |
| Toyota Sienna consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that by driving the Toyota Sienna over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 72 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 550 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Sienna gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.99 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Toyota Sienna is larger. Toyota Sienna is 29 cm longer than the Volvo XC90, 9 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Sienna is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 993 litres | 249 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3810 litres | 2404 litres | |
|
Toyota Sienna has more luggage capacity. Toyota Sienna has 744 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC90. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Sienna (by 1406 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Sienna is 1.3 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Toyota Sienna can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 18 800 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Sienna has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |