Toyota Sienna 2010 vs Hyundai H1 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 187 HP | 174 HP | |
| Torque: | 252 NM | 227 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 18.5 seconds | |
| Toyota Sienna engine produces 13 HP more power than Hyundai H1, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Hyundai H1. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 11.4 | |
| Toyota Sienna consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai H1, which means that by driving the Toyota Sienna over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Toyota Sienna) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Hyundai H1) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Lexus RX, Toyota Highlander | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Hyundai Santa FE, Kia Sportage, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson, Kia Sorento | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Toyota Sienna engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Hyundai H1 2007 2.4 engine: Generally reliable and easy to maintain engine, with spare parts available. The engine is not particularly demanding on fuel quality. Although the manufacturer does not specify a chain change interval, it ... More about Hyundai H1 2007 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 5.13 m | |
| Width: | 1.99 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.93 m | |
| Toyota Sienna is 4 cm shorter than the Hyundai H1, 7 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Sienna is 18 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 993 litres | 851 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3810 litres | no data | |
|
Toyota Sienna has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Toyota Sienna has 142 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai H1. The Hyundai H1 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`930 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 400 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Sienna has
|
Hyundai H1 has
| |