Toyota Sienna 2003 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.3 Petrol | 3.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 233 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 328 NM | 285 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
| Toyota Sienna engine produces 53 HP more power than Chrysler Grand Voyager, whereas torque is 43 NM more than Chrysler Grand Voyager. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 12.7 | |
|
The Toyota Sienna is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Sienna consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means that by driving the Toyota Sienna over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Sienna gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Sienna engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Lexus RX, Lexus ES | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Chrysler Voyager, Chrysler Town & Country | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Chrysler Grand Voyager engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Sienna is 2 cm shorter than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1235 litres | 920 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4217 litres | 4130 litres | |
|
Toyota Sienna has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Toyota Sienna has 315 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler Grand Voyager. The Chrysler Grand Voyager may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Sienna (by 87 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`540 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Sienna has
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
| |