Toyota Sienna 2003 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.3 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Toyota Sienna) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Chrysler Grand Voyager) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 233 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 328 NM | 312 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
| Toyota Sienna engine produces 93 HP more power than Chrysler Grand Voyager, whereas torque is 16 NM more than Chrysler Grand Voyager. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 7.7 | |
|
The Chrysler Grand Voyager is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Sienna consumes 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Sienna could require 435 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| Chrysler Grand Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Sienna is 1 cm shorter than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1235 litres | 920 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
4217 litres | 4130 litres | |
|
Toyota Sienna has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Chrysler Grand Voyager may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Sienna (by 87 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`630 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Sienna has
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
| |