Toyota Sienna 2003 vs Chevrolet Astro 1995
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.3 Petrol | 4.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 233 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 328 NM | 339 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Toyota Sienna engine produces 43 HP more power than Chevrolet Astro, but torque is 11 NM less than Chevrolet Astro. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 12.5 | |
|
The Toyota Sienna is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Sienna consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Astro, which means that by driving the Toyota Sienna over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 102 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| Chevrolet Astro gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Toyota Sienna) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Chevrolet Astro) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 1.97 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.90 m | |
| Toyota Sienna is 26 cm longer than the Chevrolet Astro, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota Sienna is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1235 litres | 1170 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4217 litres | 4825 litres | |
| Toyota Sienna has 65 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Astro. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Astro (by 608 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`700 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Sienna has
|
Chevrolet Astro has
| |