Toyota Sienna 2005 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.3 Petrol | 3.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 215 HP | 193 HP | |
Torque: | 301 NM | 305 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
Toyota Sienna engine produces 22 HP more power than Chrysler Grand Voyager, but torque is 4 NM less than Chrysler Grand Voyager. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 12.7 | |
The Toyota Sienna is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Sienna consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means that by driving the Toyota Sienna over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 76 litres | 75 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
840 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
Toyota Sienna gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.08 m | 5.14 m | |
Width: | 1.97 m | 1.95 m | |
Height: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Sienna is 6 cm shorter than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 1235 litres | 638 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4217 litres | 3296 litres | |
Toyota Sienna has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Toyota Sienna has 597 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler Grand Voyager. The Chrysler Grand Voyager may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Sienna (by 921 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`690 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 7400 | 4600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Sienna has
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
| |