Toyota Sienna 2010 vs Honda CR-V 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Toyota Sienna is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Honda CR-V has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Toyota Sienna is available only with front wheel drive, while Honda CR-V can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.7 - 3.5 (petrol) | 1.6 - 2.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Honda CR-V is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 187 - 266 HP | 120 - 185 HP | |
| Torque: | 252 - 392 NM | 192 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.7 - 12.8 seconds | |
| In general, Honda CR-V are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Toyota Sienna. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 - 13.1 | 4.5 - 8.4 | |
|
Toyota Sienna petrol engines consumes on average 4.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 168 - 170 mm (6.6 - 6.7 inches) | 160 - 170 mm (6.3 - 6.7 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.99 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Toyota Sienna is larger. Toyota Sienna is 53 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 17 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Sienna is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 993 litres | 1053 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
3810 litres | 2008 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Toyota Sienna uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Sienna (by 1802 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Sienna is 0.4 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Toyota Sienna can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | ~ 2`133 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Sienna has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |