Toyota Sienna 2010 vs Honda CR-V 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Toyota Sienna is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Honda CR-V has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Toyota Sienna is available only with front wheel drive, while Honda CR-V can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.7 - 3.5 (petrol) | 1.6 - 2.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Honda CR-V is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 187 - 266 HP | 120 - 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 252 - 392 NM | 190 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.7 - 12.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 - 13.1 | 4.5 - 8.4 | |
|
Toyota Sienna petrol engines consumes on average 4.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.99 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Toyota Sienna is larger. Toyota Sienna is 53 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 17 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Sienna is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 993 litres | 589 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3810 litres | 1669 litres | |
|
Toyota Sienna has more luggage capacity. Toyota Sienna has 404 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Sienna (by 2141 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Sienna is 0.4 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Toyota Sienna can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`133 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 17 600 | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Sienna has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |