Toyota Sienna 2010 vs Toyota Picnic 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Toyota Sienna is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Toyota Picnic has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Engines: | 2.7 - 3.5 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.2 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 187 - 266 HP | 90 - 128 HP | |
Torque: | 252 - 392 NM | 178 - 205 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.8 - 13.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 - 13.1 | 7.7 - 9.5 | |
Toyota Sienna petrol engines consumes on average 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Picnic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.09 m | 4.53 m | |
Width: | 1.99 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.75 m | 1.62 m | |
Toyota Sienna is larger. Toyota Sienna is 56 cm longer than the Toyota Picnic, 29 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Sienna is 13 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 993 litres | 180 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3810 litres | 1840 litres | |
Toyota Sienna has more luggage capacity. Toyota Sienna has 813 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Picnic. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Sienna (by 1970 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Toyota Sienna is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Picnic, which means Toyota Sienna can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`007 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | high | |
Average price (€): | 18 400 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Sienna has
|
Toyota Picnic has
| |