Toyota Sienna 1997 vs Toyota Picnic 1996

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Toyota Sienna
1997 - 2003
Toyota Picnic
1996 - 2001
Gearbox: Automatic Manual/Automatic
Toyota Sienna is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Toyota Picnic has both automatic and manual transmission options.
Engines: 3.0 (petrol)2.0 - 2.2 (petrol, diesel)

Performance

Power: 197 - 213 HP90 - 128 HP
Torque: 284 - 298 NM178 - 205 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.4 - 9.7 seconds10.8 - 13.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.5 - 9.67.7 - 9.5
Toyota Sienna petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Picnic.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.92 m4.53 m
Width: 1.87 m1.70 m
Height: 1.71 m1.62 m
Toyota Sienna is larger.
Toyota Sienna is 39 cm longer than the Toyota Picnic, 17 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Sienna is 9 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 755 litres180 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
4050 litres1840 litres
Toyota Sienna has more luggage capacity.
Toyota Sienna has 575 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Picnic. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Sienna (by 2210 litres).
Turning diameter: no data11 meters
Gross weight (kg): no data~ 2`007
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
high
Average price (€): no data2000
Pros and Cons: Toyota Sienna has
  • automatic transmission only
  • only petrol engines available
  • roomier boot
Toyota Picnic has
  • both manual and automatic
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv