Toyota Sienna 2003 vs Volvo XC90 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Toyota Sienna is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Volvo XC90 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 3.3 (petrol) | 2.4 - 4.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Volvo XC90 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 233 HP | 163 - 315 HP | |
| Torque: | 328 NM | 320 - 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 7.3 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 - 10.6 | 8.2 - 14.0 | |
|
Toyota Sienna petrol engines consumes on average 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC90. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Toyota Sienna is larger. Toyota Sienna is 28 cm longer than the Volvo XC90, 7 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1235 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4217 litres | 2404 litres | |
|
Toyota Sienna has more luggage capacity. Toyota Sienna has 705 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC90. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Sienna (by 1813 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`737 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Sienna has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |