Toyota Proace 2020 vs Citroen Jumpy 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 144 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Toyota Proace engine produces 33 HP less power than Citroen Jumpy, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Citroen Jumpy. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.7 | |
|
The Toyota Proace is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Proace consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Jumpy, which means that by driving the Toyota Proace over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 69 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1350 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 1430 km on highway | 1290 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Proace gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.96 m | 4.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.88 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Proace and Citroen Jumpy are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 507 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
3968 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 2`675 kg | 2`760 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`536 kg | 1`657 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 1`139 kg | 1`103 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 11 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Proace has
|
Citroen Jumpy has
| |