Toyota Proace 2018 vs Volkswagen Caddy 2020
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Toyota Proace engine produces 2 HP less power than Volkswagen Caddy, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Volkswagen Caddy. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 5.1 | |
|
The Toyota Proace is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Proace consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Caddy, which means that by driving the Toyota Proace over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 69 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1430 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| Toyota Proace gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.91 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Toyota Proace is larger. Toyota Proace is 11 cm longer than the Volkswagen Caddy, 7 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Proace is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1633 litres | 3100 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
3397 litres | 3100 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Toyota Proace uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Proace (by 297 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`220 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 22 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Proace has
|
Volkswagen Caddy has
| |