Toyota Proace 2016 vs Volkswagen Caddy 2020
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Toyota Proace engine produces 28 HP more power than Volkswagen Caddy, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Volkswagen Caddy. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 4.5 | |
|
The Volkswagen Caddy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Proace consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Caddy, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Proace could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 69 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1210 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 1350 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.91 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Toyota Proace is larger. Toyota Proace is 11 cm longer than the Volkswagen Caddy, 7 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Proace is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1633 litres | 3100 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3397 litres | 3100 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Toyota Proace has 1467 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Caddy. This could mean that the Toyota Proace uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Proace (by 297 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`220 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 21 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Proace has
|
Volkswagen Caddy has
| |