Toyota Proace 2013 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 128 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Proace engine produces 56 HP less power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Volkswagen Sharan. Due to the lower power, Toyota Proace reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 5.3 | |
|
The Volkswagen Sharan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Proace consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Proace could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1250 km in combined cycle | 1320 km in combined cycle | |
| 1370 km on highway | 1550 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Sharan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.14 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.98 m | 1.72 m | |
| Toyota Proace is 29 cm longer than the Volkswagen Sharan, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota Proace is 26 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 955 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 2430 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.6 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Proace is 0.7 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Sharan, which means Toyota Proace can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`932 kg | 2`400 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`795 kg | 1`725 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 1`137 kg | 675 kg | |
| Toyota Proace load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 41 procentiem more than Volkswagen Sharan. Therefore, Toyota Proace is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 12 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Proace has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |