Toyota Proace 2013 vs Renault Trafic 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 15.1 seconds | |
|
Toyota Proace is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Proace engine produces 48 HP more power than Renault Trafic, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Renault Trafic. Thanks to more power Toyota Proace reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 7.5 | |
| Toyota Proace consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Trafic, which means that by driving the Toyota Proace over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| Renault Trafic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.14 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.98 m | 1.94 m | |
| Toyota Proace is 36 cm longer than the Renault Trafic, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota Proace is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1240 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Proace is 0.8 metres more than that of the Renault Trafic, which means Toyota Proace can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`950 | 2`790 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 15 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Proace has
|
Renault Trafic has
| |