Toyota Proace 2013 vs Opel Vivaro 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Toyota Proace engine produces 38 HP more power than Opel Vivaro, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Opel Vivaro. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 5.7 | |
|
The Opel Vivaro is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Proace consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Vivaro, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Proace could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1250 km in combined cycle | 1400 km in combined cycle | |
| Opel Vivaro gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.14 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.96 m | |
| Height: | 1.98 m | 1.97 m | |
| Toyota Proace is 15 cm longer than the Opel Vivaro, 6 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1000 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 3200 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 2`973 kg | 2`960 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`836 kg | 1`665 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 1`137 kg | 1`295 kg | |
| Toyota Proace load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 14 procentiem less than Opel Vivaro. Therefore, Opel Vivaro is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Proace has
|
Opel Vivaro has
| |