Toyota Proace 2016 vs Citroen Jumpy 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 - 177 HP | 95 - 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 - 400 NM | 210 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.1 - 13.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 - 6.3 | 5.1 - 5.9 | |
|
On average, a Toyota Proace with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Citroen Jumpy. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.96 m | 4.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.88 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Proace and Citroen Jumpy are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 655 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
3968 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.9 meters | |
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`781 kg | ~ 2`839 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`758 kg | ~ 1`649 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 1`023 kg | ~ 1`190 kg | |
| Toyota Proace load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 16 procentiem less than Citroen Jumpy. Therefore, Citroen Jumpy is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 11 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Citroen Jumpy has
| |