Toyota Proace 2013 vs Renault Trafic 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 163 HP | 90 - 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 - 340 NM | 260 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 16.5 seconds | 15.1 - 19 seconds | |
| In general, Toyota Proace are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Renault Trafic. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 - 7.2 | 6.6 - 7.5 | |
|
On average, Toyota Proace equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Trafic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.02 m | 4.98 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.98 m | 1.94 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Proace is 4 cm longer than the Renault Trafic, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota Proace is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 2150 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.6 meters | 13.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Proace is 0.5 metres less than that of the Renault Trafic, which means Toyota Proace can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`921 | ~ 2`790 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 15 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Proace has
|
| |