Toyota Proace 2013 vs Citroen Jumpy 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 163 HP | 98 - 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 - 340 NM | 260 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 16.5 seconds | 11 - 16.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 - 7.2 | 6.6 - 7.6 | |
|
On average, Toyota Proace equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Jumpy. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.02 m | 4.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.98 m | 1.94 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Proace is 5 cm longer than the Citroen Jumpy, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota Proace is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 770 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 2163 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.6 meters | 12.6 meters | |
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`921 kg | ~ 2`795 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`788 kg | ~ 1`916 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 1`133 kg | ~ 879 kg | |
| Toyota Proace load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 22 procentiem more than Citroen Jumpy. Therefore, Toyota Proace is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 15 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Proace has
|
| |