Toyota Previa 2000 vs Volkswagen Sharan 1997
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 156 HP | 116 HP | |
Torque: | 225 NM | 170 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 17.2 seconds | |
Toyota Previa is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Previa engine produces 40 HP more power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 55 NM more than Volkswagen Sharan. Thanks to more power Toyota Previa reaches 100 km/h speed 6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 | 11.6 | |
The Toyota Previa is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Previa consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that by driving the Toyota Previa over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
860 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
Toyota Previa 2000 2.4 engine: A fairly robust engine, easy to maintain and spare parts are readily available. Not too sensitive to fuel quality. High oil consumption and relatively short chain life (around 170 000 km). | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.75 m | 4.62 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.77 m | 1.73 m | |
Toyota Previa is 13 cm longer than the Volkswagen Sharan, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Previa is 4 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 495 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2370 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Toyota Previa is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Sharan, which means Toyota Previa can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`240 | 1`800 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 2200 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Previa has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |