Toyota Previa 2001 vs Chrysler Voyager 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 262 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
|
Toyota Previa is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Previa engine produces 2 HP more power than Chrysler Voyager, but torque is 12 NM less than Chrysler Voyager. Thanks to more power Toyota Previa reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 9.2 | |
|
The Toyota Previa is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Previa consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Voyager, which means that by driving the Toyota Previa over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1220 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Previa gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chrysler Voyager engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota RAV4, Toyota Corolla Verso | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Previa might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Chrysler Voyager engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Previa 2001 2.0 engine: The engine was known for its solid technical characteristics.
One of its drawbacks is the lack of hydraulic lifters, requiring periodic valve clearance adjustments. The next-generation 1AD-FTV engine was equipped with ... More about Toyota Previa 2001 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.77 m | 1.74 m | |
| Toyota Previa is 2 cm longer than the Chrysler Voyager, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Previa is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 495 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2370 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Previa is 0.3 metres less than that of the Chrysler Voyager. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`200 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Previa has
|
Chrysler Voyager has
| |