Toyota Previa 2003 vs Toyota Picnic 1996
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 HP | 128 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 NM | 178 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Toyota Previa is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Previa engine produces 28 HP more power than Toyota Picnic, whereas torque is 47 NM more than Toyota Picnic. Thanks to more power Toyota Previa reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 | 9.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.4 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Picnic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Previa consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Picnic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Previa could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Previa consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Picnic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Previa gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota RAV4, Toyota Camry | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Carina E, Toyota Hiace | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Picnic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Previa 2003 2.4 engine: A fairly robust engine, easy to maintain and spare parts are readily available. Not too sensitive to fuel quality. High oil consumption and relatively short chain life (around 170 000 km). | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Toyota Previa is larger. Toyota Previa is 25 cm longer than the Toyota Picnic, 9 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Previa is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 495 litres | 180 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2370 litres | 1840 litres | |
|
Toyota Previa has more luggage capacity. Toyota Previa has 315 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Picnic. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Previa (by 530 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Previa is 0.6 metres more than that of the Toyota Picnic, which means Toyota Previa can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`240 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Previa has
|
Toyota Picnic has
| |