Toyota Previa 2003 vs Chrysler Voyager 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 149 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Toyota Previa engine produces 33 HP less power than Chrysler Voyager, whereas torque is 110 NM less than Chrysler Voyager. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 8.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 9.5 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Previa is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Previa consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Voyager, which means that by driving the Toyota Previa over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Previa consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Voyager. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Previa gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chrysler Voyager engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota RAV4, Toyota Corolla Verso | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Previa might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Chrysler Voyager engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Previa 2003 2.0 engine: The engine was known for its solid technical characteristics.
One of its drawbacks is the lack of hydraulic lifters, requiring periodic valve clearance adjustments. The next-generation 1AD-FTV engine was equipped with ... More about Toyota Previa 2003 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Toyota Previa is smaller, but slightly higher. Toyota Previa is 3 cm shorter than the Chrysler Voyager, 21 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Previa is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 495 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2370 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Previa is 0.1 metres more than that of the Chrysler Voyager. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`200 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Previa has
|
Chrysler Voyager has
| |