Toyota Previa 2003 vs Renault Trafic 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 82 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 14.9 seconds | |
|
Toyota Previa is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Previa engine produces 34 HP more power than Renault Trafic, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Renault Trafic. Thanks to more power Toyota Previa reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 8.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Previa is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Previa consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Trafic, which means that by driving the Toyota Previa over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Previa consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Trafic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km with real consumption | 1080 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Trafic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Renault Trafic engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota RAV4, Toyota Corolla Verso | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volvo V40, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Volvo S40, Mitsubishi Carisma | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Trafic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Previa 2003 2.0 engine: The engine was known for its solid technical characteristics.
One of its drawbacks is the lack of hydraulic lifters, requiring periodic valve clearance adjustments. The next-generation 1AD-FTV engine was equipped with ... More about Toyota Previa 2003 2.0 engine Renault Trafic 2001 1.9 engine: Long-lasting and fuel-efficient engine. Maintaining oil change and maintenance intervals is essential for a long engine life, as poor or untimely oil changes can result in turbine and oil pump damage, followed ... More about Renault Trafic 2001 1.9 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.78 m | 1.94 m | |
|
Toyota Previa is smaller. Toyota Previa and Renault Trafic are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 495 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2370 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`200 | 2`765 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Previa has
|
Renault Trafic has
| |