Toyota Picnic 1997 vs Volkswagen Sharan 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 NM | 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.9 seconds | 16.4 seconds | |
| Toyota Picnic engine produces 20 HP less power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Volkswagen Sharan. Despite less power, Toyota Picnic reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Sharan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Picnic consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Picnic could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Picnic consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 1410 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 1100 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Sharan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Toyota Picnic is smaller. Toyota Picnic is 9 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Sharan, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Picnic is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 180 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1840 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Picnic is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Sharan, which means Toyota Picnic can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`010 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | high | low | |
| Toyota Picnic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Sharan has serious deffects in 320 percent more cases than Toyota Picnic, so Toyota Picnic quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Picnic has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |