Toyota Picnic 1997 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.9 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Picnic engine produces 25 HP less power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 105 NM less than Volkswagen Sharan. Due to the lower power, Toyota Picnic reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Sharan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Picnic consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Picnic could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Picnic consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Sharan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Toyota Picnic is smaller. Toyota Picnic is 10 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Sharan, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Picnic is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 180 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1840 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Picnic is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`010 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | low | |
| Toyota Picnic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Sharan has serious deffects in 320 percent more cases than Toyota Picnic, so Toyota Picnic quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 6.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Picnic has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |