Toyota Picnic 1997 vs Ford Galaxy 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 NM | 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.9 seconds | 16.4 seconds | |
| Toyota Picnic engine produces 20 HP less power than Ford Galaxy, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Ford Galaxy. Despite less power, Toyota Picnic reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Galaxy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Picnic consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Picnic could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Picnic consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 1410 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 1040 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Galaxy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Toyota Picnic is smaller. Toyota Picnic is 9 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Picnic is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 6 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 180 litres | 266 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 266 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 180 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1840 litres | 2610 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Galaxy (by 770 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Picnic is 0.1 metres less than that of the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`010 kg | 2`400 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`420 kg | 1`640 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 590 kg | 760 kg | |
| Toyota Picnic load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 29 procentiem less than Ford Galaxy. Therefore, Ford Galaxy is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | low | |
| Toyota Picnic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 300 percent more cases than Toyota Picnic, so Toyota Picnic quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 8.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Picnic has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |