Toyota Picnic 1997 vs Ford Galaxy 1995
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 HP | 90 HP | |
Torque: | 205 NM | 202 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.9 seconds | 17.1 seconds | |
Toyota Picnic is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Picnic and Ford Galaxy have the same engine power, but Toyota Picnic torque is 3 NM more than Ford Galaxy. Toyota Picnic reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 6.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
The Ford Galaxy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Picnic consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Picnic could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Picnic consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 75 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
930 km on highway | 1410 km on highway | ||
800 km with real consumption | 1110 km with real consumption | ||
Ford Galaxy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.53 m | 4.62 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.62 m | 1.73 m | |
Toyota Picnic is smaller. Toyota Picnic is 9 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Picnic is 11 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 180 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1840 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Toyota Picnic is 0.1 metres less than that of the Ford Galaxy. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`010 | 2`000 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | high | low | |
Toyota Picnic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 300 percent more cases than Toyota Picnic, so Toyota Picnic quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 2200 | 800 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 8.3/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Picnic has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |